{"id":565,"date":"2019-11-19T20:11:21","date_gmt":"2019-11-19T20:11:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/tiam.com.pl\/?page_id=565"},"modified":"2026-03-03T12:49:17","modified_gmt":"2026-03-03T12:49:17","slug":"for-reviewers","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/problemyjakosci.com.pl\/en\/?page_id=565","title":{"rendered":"For Reviewers"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\"><strong>All scientific manuscripts are subject to double blind peer review.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-file\"><a href=\"http:\/\/problemyjakosci.com.pl\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Problems-of-Quality_Review-form.pdf\"><strong>Review form<\/strong><\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/problemyjakosci.com.pl\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Problems-of-Quality_Review-form.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button\" download>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-file\"><a href=\"http:\/\/problemyjakosci.com.pl\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/reviewing-procedure.pdf\">Reviewing procedure<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\"><strong>Reviewing procedure in\nSIGMA-NOT Publishing House<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">1) If the scientific article fits the journal\u2019s\nscope, the Editor-in-Chief appoints two Reviewers of recognized competence\nwithin the field of research, preferably with professor or post-doctoral\ndegree. The reviewers must: <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">\u2212 deliver an objective, independent opinion, <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">\u2212 ensure no conflict of interests \u2013 they should\nhave no personal relationships or business relations with Authors, <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">\u2212 keep any information regarding the content\nand opinion confidential. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">2) When the Reviewers are chosen, the\nEditor-in-Chief sends them a written offer with either a short description or\nan abstract of the article, defines range of reviews and sets a deadline \u2013 up to a\nmaximum of 6 weeks. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">3) If the Reviewers accept the offer, the\nEditorial Board provides them with a full version of the article and an\nobligatory peer review report. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">4) Reviewers\u2019 personal details are classified\nand they can be declassified only at the Author\u2019s request and with the\nreviewer\u2019s permission in case the review is negative or the article contains\narguable elements. Once a year, the Editorial Board publishes in its journal\nthe full list of the Reviewers cooperating with the journal. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">5) Once the review process is complete, the\nReviewer delivers electronic version of the review by e-mail and the Assistant\nEditor: <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">\u2212 informs the Author that the review has been\nsubmitted to the journal (when the reviewer states that the article does not\nrequire corrections or it requires only minor editorial corrections), <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">\u2212 forwards the review with critical comments to\nthe Author, who is encouraged to make corrections suggested by the reviewer. If\nthe Author disagrees with certain remarks, he\/she is under obligation to\nprepare response letter substantiating his position. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">\u2212 sends the revised article to the Reviewer\nagain, if the Reviewer finds it necessary. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">6) The Editorial Board makes the final decision\nabout publishing the article based on analysis of the review and the revised\nversion of the article that the Author has resubmitted. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">7) If one of the reviews is negative, the\nEditor-in-Chief makes decision about rejection of the article or invites an\nadditional reviewer so as to get an extra opinion before making a decision.\nWhen both reviews are negative, the Editor-in-Chief rejects the article. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">8) The final version of the article (after\nmaking up) is sent to the Author. The article is queued for publication, which takes a maximum of 6\nmonths. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">9) Non-scientific articles do not need to be reviewed and they are accepted for publication by the Editor-in-Chief. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\" id=\"block-7aa4c87e-cab5-4994-a6a1-f775f3123ca9\"><strong>List of Reviewers<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. in\u017c. Wiktor Adamus,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. Pawe\u0142 J. Borkowski,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">prof. dr hab. Marek Bugdol,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. in\u017c. Zdzis\u0142aw Czaplicki,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. Eugenia Czernyszewicz,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr in\u017c. Anna Dobrowolska,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. in\u017c. Marta Dudek-Burlikowska,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr in\u017c. Tomasz Ewertowski,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">prof. dr hab. in\u017c. Jan Figurski,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. in\u017c. Bo\u017cena Gajdzik,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. in\u017c. Piotr Grudowski,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. in\u017c. J\u00f3zef Gruszka,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. in\u017c. El\u017cbieta Ha\u0107-Szyma\u0144czuk,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr Marzena Hajduk-Stelmachowicz,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. in\u017c. Katarzyna Hys,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">p\u0142k dr hab. in\u017c. Tomasz Ja\u0142owiec,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. in\u017c. Ma\u0142gorzata Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. in\u017c. Piotr Kafel,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. Agnieszka Kister,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">prof. dr hab. in\u017c. Zbigniew K\u0142os<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">prof. dr hab. Stanis\u0142aw Kowalczyk,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. Aleksandra Kowalska,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. in\u017c. Jolanta Kowalska,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. in\u017c. Anna Lis,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr n. ekon. Mira Lisiecka-Bie\u0142anowicz,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr in\u017c. Roma Marczewska-Ku\u017ama,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr in\u017c. Ewa Marja\u0144ska,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. in\u017c. Ma\u0142gorzata Matusiak,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr in\u017c. Anna Mazur,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. Oleksandr Melnychenko,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. in\u017c. Agnieszka Misztal,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">p\u0142k dr hab. Szymon Mitkow,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. in\u017c. Przemys\u0142aw Niewiadomski,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. Honorata Nyga-\u0141ukaszewska,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">prof. dr hab. in\u017c. Leszek Pacholski,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">prof. dr hab. in\u017c. Piotr Przyby\u0142owski,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">prof. dr hab. Andrzej Rapacz,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. Piotr Rogala,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. in\u017c. Marek Roszak,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. Joanna Sad\u0142owska-Wrzesi\u0144ska,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. Adam Skrzypek,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. in\u017c. Ma\u0142gorzata S\u0142awi\u0144ska,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. in\u017c. Agnieszka Stachowiak,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">prof. dr hab. Katarzyna Szczepa\u0144ska,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. Dawid Szostek,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">prof. dr hab. in\u017c. Maria Szpakowska,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. in\u017c. Andrzej \u015awiderski,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. in\u017c. Anna Sylwia Tarczy\u0144ska,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">prof. dr hab. in\u017c. Stanis\u0142aw Tkaczyk,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">prof. dr hab. in\u017c. Edwin Tytyk,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. in\u017c. Wies\u0142aw Urban,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">prof. dr hab. Maciej Urbaniak,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. S\u0142awomir Wawak,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. in\u017c. Ewa Wi\u0119cek-Janka,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">prof. dr hab. Ma\u0142gorzata Z. Wi\u015bniewska,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. Hanna W\u0142odarkiewicz-Klimek,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">prof. dr hab. in\u017c. Rados\u0142aw Wolniak<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">prof. dr hab. in\u017c. Jaros\u0142aw Wo\u0142ejszo, p\u0142k rez.;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr hab. Zofia Zymonik,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">dr Janusz Zymonik,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\">prof. dr hab. in\u017c. Jerzy \u017buchowski<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-normal-font-size\"><strong>Questions? <\/strong> <br> e-mail to: problemyjakosci@sigma-not.pl <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>All scientific manuscripts are subject to double blind peer review. Reviewing procedure in SIGMA-NOT Publishing House 1) If the scientific article fits the journal\u2019s scope, the Editor-in-Chief appoints two Reviewers of recognized competence within the field of research, preferably with professor or post-doctoral degree. The reviewers must: \u2212 deliver an objective, independent opinion, \u2212 ensure [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/problemyjakosci.com.pl\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/565"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/problemyjakosci.com.pl\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/problemyjakosci.com.pl\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/problemyjakosci.com.pl\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/problemyjakosci.com.pl\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=565"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/problemyjakosci.com.pl\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/565\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1442,"href":"https:\/\/problemyjakosci.com.pl\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/565\/revisions\/1442"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/problemyjakosci.com.pl\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=565"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}